Aug 15, 2010

Posted by in history

A few words about mission patches.

Every manned American space mission, since the first Mercury flight has had a mission patch. I really don’t know what these patches are for. No astronaut actually gets confused about what flight (s)he’s on.

In any case, these patches are symbols of America’s voyages above the planet. And they tell stories.

Gus Grissom and the Molly Brown

Exhibit A: the Gemini 3 patch. The patch shows the spacecraft NOT in orbit, but floating in the ocean. The patch also includes the words “Gemini 3″ and the nickname for the spacecraft, coined by mission commander Gus Grissom: “Molly Brown”.

Gus Grissom wouldn't let the Molly Brown sink.

The nickname was a humorous reference to the (then current) broadway musical, “The Unsinkable Molly Brown”. Grissom’s first spacecraft, Liberty Bell 7, sunk to the bottom of the ocean after splashdown. Grissom was determined not to lose his new spacecraft.

NASA was not amused. They took more notice of patch design…and spacecraft names. Future Gemini flight would use only their numers as names (i.e. Gemini 4, Gemini 5, etc.)

C.C. Williams and Apollo 12

Then there’s Apollo 12. During Apollo, spacecraft names came back in vogue. After all, when missions have TWO spacecraft (a command ship and lunar module), you need to refer to them separately.

C.C. Williams represented on a mission patch.

The command module for Apollo 12 was called Yankee Clipper. The mission patch shows a 3-masted ship “sailing” around the moon.

Above the moon, we see 4 stars representing the crew. Hey, wait! Apollo missions had 3-man crews, not four!

The fourth star represents astronaut C.C. (“Clifton”) Williams. Based on regular crew rotation, Williams should have been on that flight. Williams would have been the fourth man to walk on the moon.

But Williams died when his jet crashed on October 5, 1967. Instead of Williams, Alan Bean served as Lunar Module pilot on that flight. But Williams was not forgotten.

  • Volker

    Mission Patches indeed tell a lot of stories. Here is one about segregation and acceptance:

    Starting in 1984, with the flight of STS-41G, NASA made additional room in the space shuttle, allowing specialists from the outside, called payload specialists, to accompany specific experiments.

    Most of the payload specialist, many of them from foreign countries joined the astronaut corps only for a short while before returning to their previous jobs. Apparently, the established group of NASA astronauts didn’t think these newcomers had the right stuff.

    That opinion was made quite clear on the mission patches of shuttle flight between 1984 and 1991. At all the patches of this time period, the names of NASA’s own astronauts are arranged in a circle around the patch while the names of the temporary astronauts were added in a second partial circle, looking more like an appendix than like a part of the crew.

    Here are four examples:
    http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/patches_hi/sts-41g.jpg
    http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/patches_hi/sts-51d.jpg
    http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/patches_hi/sts-51g.jpg
    http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/patches_hi/sts-61a.jpg

    This practice of segregation continued until 1991. The first flight at which the payload specialists were accepted as an integral part of the mission patch was STS-40.
    http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/patches_hi/sts-40.jpg

    When it comes to cooperation in space, we really came a long way!

  • Ray Katz

    Very, very interesting. Didn’t know about that. I can see that, since astronauts were originally the “gung ho” pilot types that “mission specialists” weren’t fully respected right away. Now, we know better, I think.

Stop SOPA